About Me
- Name: U2Lorax
- Location: RDU, NC, United States
U2 fan, Caniac, idealist, dreamer, environmentalist, BTVS addict, hockey nut, computer impaired coffeeholic. Did I mention U2 fan? :)
Music Links
- Am. Coalition for Ethanol
- Blue Voice
- Debt.AIDS.Trade.Africa
- DOE E85 Info
- E85 Fuel
- Earth Day Network
- Earth Policy Institute
- Earth Trends
- Ecology
- Environmental Defense
- EPA
- Greenpeace
- Live 8
- Make Poverty History
- Music Rising
- NOAA
- NPR
- Ocean Conservancy
- One Campaign
- Pew Clmate Center
- PBS
- Save the Sea Turtle
- Save the World's Oceans
- Seaweb
- Sherman's Lagoon
- Sierra Club
- Solar Electric Light Fund
- Space Weather
Environment Links
- Blogfish - Fish, Oceans and Conservation
- Canes Country
- Deep Sea News
- Crime & Mystery Muse Needed
- Marine Conservation Blog
- Music Rising Blog
- One Campaign
- RED blog
Blog Links
- Mystery Writers Assoc.
Writing Links
Archives
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- April 2011
- May 2012
This that and the other thing. Though there might be more of this than that. And little of the other things. Maybe.
Monday, October 17, 2005
blah blah Work blah blah blah
So we had a meeting this morning to 'clear the air' and 'start off our new working partnership with a bang'. Yeah right. The meeting was pointless. Only one of my company's (Company B) presidents (M) showed up and he spent most of his time talking in circles, eyeing the clock and then talking in slower circles. Confirmed that we will not get paid for snow days, terrorism scares, random days off that Prez. Bush gives federal employees (that close our building) unless we use our sick time or vacation time.
I asked "If we have to use our sick/vacation time for federal closings does that mean we'll no longer get paid for the federal holidays?" His reply was "Oh no, you're benefits haven't changed. You'll get paid for those days." then J (my boss) said "Those are days where Company B is putting money out but has none coming in." To which I replied, "Yes, I know. That's why I asked." When I was interviewed one of the much touted benefits was getting paid for snow days. Yet, somehow, our benefits haven't changed? Explain that one to me.
Company C's bigwigs didn't show, just sent T who is Company C's project manager on site. The one who we'll be training the next couple of weeks. Basically he has no power/influence over what Company C does. Only reason he showed was because we'll be working with him. Suposedly start training him tomorrow. We shall see...
Someone asked "What's the advantage for Company C to keep Company B as a subcontractor?" T replied that we all are "subject matter experts" and our "knowledge is too valuable to let go". Again, I say, Yeah Right!
Someone else asked the question that was really asked before but T chose to ignore; "Why is it more advantageous for Company C to work through Company B as opposed to hiring us all directly?" T passed the question onto M.
M informed us that it's part of the contract that they signed that Company C cannot recruit Company B employees to work for Company C. Apparently a lot of people gave him the same smirky look I'm sure I had on my face cause M then added "We have a contract where we are the contractor and Company C is the subcontractor and that same clause is in there. We cannot recruit Company C employees to work with us."
I know I wasn't the only one thinking 'What Company C employee would WANT to work for my company? Company C's benefits are better, they have cross training programs and are more firmly entrenched with the government than my company is - i.e. more job security.'
There was much posturing on M's part about the 'bonus' that Company B is putting together. Basically if we don't take our sick/vacation time we could be eligible for a bonus. Amount and qualifications still to be determined. Which is the same thing he said a couple weeks ago. Coworkers and I figure it's all just hot air to keep us from jumping ship. Especially when M goes from telling us we have to use our sick/vacation time to get paid for snow days to telling us not use our sick/vacation time unless "we really need it".
Whatever.
Note: I inadvertently saved this as a draft and didn't publish it last night, when I wrote it. So for those of you who think I'm absentminded, you may have a point ;)
I asked "If we have to use our sick/vacation time for federal closings does that mean we'll no longer get paid for the federal holidays?" His reply was "Oh no, you're benefits haven't changed. You'll get paid for those days." then J (my boss) said "Those are days where Company B is putting money out but has none coming in." To which I replied, "Yes, I know. That's why I asked." When I was interviewed one of the much touted benefits was getting paid for snow days. Yet, somehow, our benefits haven't changed? Explain that one to me.
Company C's bigwigs didn't show, just sent T who is Company C's project manager on site. The one who we'll be training the next couple of weeks. Basically he has no power/influence over what Company C does. Only reason he showed was because we'll be working with him. Suposedly start training him tomorrow. We shall see...
Someone asked "What's the advantage for Company C to keep Company B as a subcontractor?" T replied that we all are "subject matter experts" and our "knowledge is too valuable to let go". Again, I say, Yeah Right!
Someone else asked the question that was really asked before but T chose to ignore; "Why is it more advantageous for Company C to work through Company B as opposed to hiring us all directly?" T passed the question onto M.
M informed us that it's part of the contract that they signed that Company C cannot recruit Company B employees to work for Company C. Apparently a lot of people gave him the same smirky look I'm sure I had on my face cause M then added "We have a contract where we are the contractor and Company C is the subcontractor and that same clause is in there. We cannot recruit Company C employees to work with us."
I know I wasn't the only one thinking 'What Company C employee would WANT to work for my company? Company C's benefits are better, they have cross training programs and are more firmly entrenched with the government than my company is - i.e. more job security.'
There was much posturing on M's part about the 'bonus' that Company B is putting together. Basically if we don't take our sick/vacation time we could be eligible for a bonus. Amount and qualifications still to be determined. Which is the same thing he said a couple weeks ago. Coworkers and I figure it's all just hot air to keep us from jumping ship. Especially when M goes from telling us we have to use our sick/vacation time to get paid for snow days to telling us not use our sick/vacation time unless "we really need it".
Whatever.
Note: I inadvertently saved this as a draft and didn't publish it last night, when I wrote it. So for those of you who think I'm absentminded, you may have a point ;)